| Date: 11/14/00
Comments
Skip Foster Star Editor
SHELBY - There were no TV networks
to project the winner of the 1920 election for North Carolina governor.
If there had been, it would have
been "too close to call" - for about 11 days.
Sound familiar?
In an election strikingly similar
to the current presidential morass, then-Lt. Gov. O. Max Gardner Sr. squared
off against Charlotte's Cameron Morrison in the Democratic primary for
the top spot in the state.
In those days, the winner of the
Democratic primary was a lock to be elected governor. The election was
June 5 and the count took until June 16. When the electoral dust had cleared,
Morrison led Gardner by 87 votes, less than 1 vote per county.
O. Max Gardner III, a present-day
Shelby attorney, says the similarities between that race and the Gore-Bush
deadlock are many.
"That year was the first year
North Carolina allowed the use of absentee ballots," O. Max Gardner III
said. "These ballots were primarily devised for use of the men in the military
service.
"My grandfather had hard evidence
of fraud in a number of eastern counties. After several days of intense
pressure from his supporters to file legal proceedings in court, he decided
that it would be in the best interest of the state and his party to concede
the election to Morrison."
Eight years later, Gardner Sr.
had no opposition in the Democratic primary for governor and was elected
in November.
O. Max Gardner III says his grandfather
would have a problem with how things are panning out in Florida. In particular,
he said, he believes his grandfather would have opposed the manual recount
of only some of Florida's counties.
"I really don't think that's fair,"
said Gardner III. "I think my grandfather would say, if we're going to
hand county votes in four counties, it should be done in all counties.
He would encourage both sides to meet together, to stop all this spin,
litigation and threatened litigation."
Gardner III said the loser might
quickly find a silver lining.
"If you lose in a way like my
grandfather lost in 1920, you certainly have great advantages the next
time you run. Everybody in the party felt like he had done in 1920 not
what was the best thing for him, but what was best for the state. He was
recognized for that."
Joseph L. Morrison, in his biography
of O. Max Gardner Sr., wrote: "His being utterly free of rancor singled
him out as the best political sport in Tar Heel annals. His defeat had
made him a statewide figure, and his conduct quickly pushed him to the
fore as the likeliest man for governor next time." |